Sunday, March 15, 2009

REPOST: Twin boys taken!mom didnt vaccine

----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: Lori (77247784)
To:
Date: Mar 14, 2009 8:43 PM
Subject: REPOST: Twin boys taken!mom didnt vaccine


----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: JUAN (FU¢K "CHANGE") (35472796)
To:
Date: Mar 14, 2009 4:47 PM
Subject: REPOST: Twin boys taken!mom didnt vaccine


JUAN (FU¢K "CH…

















Reno (170785320)
To:
Date: Mar 14, 2009 5:40 PM
Subject: REPOST: Twin boys taken!mom didnt vaccine
Somebody please, get this link to Darryl:
http://www. vaclib. org/exempt/california. htm

----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: Ridin'dirty☮Μολών Λaβέ (408562765)
To:
Date: Mar 14, 2009 11:39 AM
Subject: THIS PERSON NEEDS OUR HELP! sOCIAL SERVICES TOOK HER TWINS!

I just talked to the mom on the phone....Everytime she got the kids vaccinated they got very sick! This is wrong!...Her hearing is at 8:45 at 341 City Dr Orange County Ca...The Lady that took the kids name is Emma Miller 714-940-4619 .

Repost please! More info to come! Also they have split the boys up!

----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: THINK IT'S NOT ILLEGAL YET!! Μολών Λaβέ !! (449510990)
To:
Date: Mar 14, 2009 1:41 AM
Subject: THIS PERSON NEEDS YOUR HELP...C.P.S..JUST TOOK HIS TWINS..

I CONSIDER THIS A PERSONAL FAVOR......

I WILL PAY IT FORWARD YOU HAVE MY WORD!!

FUCKING NAZI C.P.S.

TOOK MY 1 YEAR OLD TWINS TODAY
Body: From: Darryl Hardin

While I was at work, fucking Nazi's claimed that My gf is guilty of Medical Neglect because she told them she refused a round of vaccination shots for my twin sons. They came in this afternoon with 3 Police officers and 3 paramedics. They claimed there reason was 2 missed medical appointments and that it constituted an "immediate medical danger" to my children. The 1st so called missed appointment, was when my son was in the hospital, the same hospital where the appointment was scheduled for 8 days, caused by complications from the last vaccine he was given.(This was in mid December.


My sons were in perfect spirits when they arrived. At the time of CPS'S arrival, they were in the middle of a physical therapy program with there Therapist who shows up every week. The Therapist asked them if they would like any information as to what she had witnessed, which they refused. They gave no paperwork (offical) as to why they took the children. All they left were a few of there handouts (leaflets) and 2 business cards for social workers, both of who failed to answer my voice-mail pleas for a return call. They also left a number for a way a family member could pick them up, but, that # was a recording that no message could be left on. It's now 8 hours later, and I still have no clue as to where they've taken my sons. I called the police dept who escorted CPS goons to abduct my children. For 1 1/2 hours they tried 1st to tell me they were not there, then that only 2 officers were there, but refused to give me there names. Finally after talking with 4 different individuals, I finally was able to identify them. I called Social Services, but was told "they didnt have any information, but I needed to talk w/ the Social Worker, who is on vacation til Thurs. next week.


So as of right now, my Son's whereabouts are a mystery. If anyone has any advice as to what I can do to protect my 1 year old twin sons, I would be very grateful.


Thanks,

Darryl Hardin

714 910-0969

By the way, There are some of you who think there is more to the story then I am telling. The home my boys lived in is immaculately clean. These boys are clean, fresh dressed, and healthy. My girlfriend is drug free. I maintain my own residence. There was no other reason stated for taking the boys except the (2) missed appointments.

Labels: ,

baby hygiene products packed with extra cancer causing chemicals

----------------- Bulletin Message -----------------
From: Veritas (Latin For Truth) (115335838)
To:
Date: Mar 15, 2009 5:50 AM
Subject: baby hygiene products packed with extra cancer causing chem


Veritas (Latin For Truth)


From: Kevan (86564593
USA ALERT (200013926)

Probable Carcinogens Found in Baby Toiletries
By Lyndsey Layton
Washington Post Staff Writer
Friday, March 13, 2009; Page A04

http://www. washingtonpost. com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/03/12/AR2009031202940. html?hpid=moreheadlines

More than half the baby shampoo, lotion and other infant care products analyzed by a health advocacy group were found to contain trace amounts of two chemicals that are believed to cause cancer, the organization said yesterday.


Some of the biggest names on the market, including Johnson & Johnson Baby Shampoo and Baby Magic lotion, tested positive for 1,4-dioxane or formaldehyde, or both, the nonprofit Campaign for Safe Cosmetics reported.


The chemicals, which the Environmental Protection Agency has characterized as probable carcinogens, are not intentionally added to the products and are not listed among ingredients on labels. Instead, they appear to be byproducts of the manufacturing process. Formaldehyde is created when other chemicals in the product break down over time, while 1,4-dioxane is formed when foaming agents are combined with ethylene oxide or similar petrochemicals.

ad_icon

The organization tested 48 baby bath products such as bubble bath and shampoo. Of those, 32 contained trace amounts of 1,4-dioxane and 23 contained small amounts of formaldehyde. Seventeen tested positive for both chemicals.


"Our intention is not to alarm parents, but to inform parents that products that claim to be gentle and pure are contaminated with carcinogens, which is completely unnecessary," said Stacy Malkan, a spokeswoman for the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics, which is calling for the government to more strictly regulate personal care products such as shampoo, lotion and makeup.


Companies that manufacture and sell the products tested by the group stressed that they comply with government standards.


"The FDA and other government agencies around the world consider these trace levels safe, and all our products meet or exceed the regulatory requirements in every country where they are sold," Johnson & Johnson said in a statement. "We are disappointed that the Campaign for Safe Cosmetics has inaccurately characterized the safety of our products, misrepresented the overwhelming consensus of scientists and government agencies that review the safety of ingredients, and unnecessarily alarmed parents.
"

The European Union has banned 1,4-dioxane as an ingredient in personal care products, but the Food and Drug Administration has not established a safe limit for the chemical in shampoo, lotion and other toiletries. It maintains that the trace amounts found in those products are not harmful.


A 1982 study by the FDA showed that 1,4-dioxane can penetrate human skin when used in lotion.


Health advocates argue, however, that federal regulators have not considered the cumulative effect of chemicals in personal care products.


"The levels we've found are relatively low, and the industry often says there's just a little bit of carcinogen in my product," Malkan said. "The problem is, we're finding a little bit of carcinogen in many products. Many of these products are used every day, so we've got repeated and frequent exposure to these low levels of chemicals. They're not the safest and purest products, and parents ought to know that.
"

In addition, government studies have not examined the effect of chemical exposure on the particular vulnerabilities of infants and children, whose bodies are still developing, the advocates said.


Several Democratic lawmakers said the report is evidence that the nation's chemical regulation system needs to be changed.


"The fact that we are bathing our kids in products contaminated with carcinogens shows how woefully out of date our cosmetics laws are and how urgently they need to be updated," said Rep. Jan Schakowsky (Ill.). "The science has moved forward; now the FDA needs to catch up and be given the authority to protect the health of Americans.
"

Sen. Dianne Feinstein (Calif.) called the findings "horrifying" and said she intends to introduce legislation that would require stronger oversight of the cosmetics industry.


The report can be found at http://www.safecosmetics.org/toxictub.

Labels: